Unicode behavior, DOM APIs, file structures, parsing differences, and other mechanisms grounded in standards or directly reproducible engineering behavior.
Trace claims to mechanisms, evidence, and limits.
The deploy includes nineteen source reports supplied for this project. The library preserves their terminology and full text, while the website’s synthesis labels established mechanisms, published evidence, frontier work, and conceptual analogy separately.
Peer-reviewed papers, documented systems, measured experiments, or broad research syntheses. Results remain conditional on models, datasets, and implementations.
Recent work requiring replication, version-specific interpretation, or caution before generalizing beyond the demonstrated setup.
A useful organizing lens that does not become an empirical fact merely because the analogy is coherent.
Seven conclusions carried into this site
1. The core asymmetry is real.
Unicode, DOM structure, metadata, tokenizer units, probability distributions, and learned representations provide machine-facing degrees of freedom beyond ordinary rendered reading.
2. Shared information matters more than raw intelligence.
A matching tokenizer, key, source-model distribution, parser, or co-training can make a signal easy to one receiver and unavailable to another.
3. Token-specific channels are powerful and brittle.
They must survive detokenization and independent receiver-side retokenization, not merely exist inside a sender model’s internal token sequence.
4. Probability is model-relative.
Surprisal, rank, entropy, and curvature are properties of a model and context, not intrinsic labels attached to words.
5. Keyed watermarks disprove universal-decoder assumptions.
A small detector with the secret can outperform an enormous unkeyed model at recognizing the intended signal.
6. Learned channels expand the threat model.
Optimization can create conventions that humans did not hand-design, but evidence does not support assuming arbitrary models decode arbitrary unknown protocols.
7. There is no universal text-only detector.
Defenders should accumulate independent evidence and document uncertainty rather than convert one score into an unqualified verdict.
8. Safe experiments separate stages.
Measure carrier accessibility, extraction, instruction uptake, tool attempts, and effects independently with inert markers and matched controls.
Local research library
Search by title, category, focus, or topic. The reader renders a conservative subset of Markdown; raw source remains available for exact inspection.
Hidden Structure in Text: Human-Subtle, Model- and Decoder-Detectable Patterns
A unifying analysis of tokenizer artifacts, probability channels, watermarking, learned steganography, prior knowledge, and layered detection.
The Invisible Attack Surface: Zero-Width and Bidirectional Unicode
A survey of invisible Unicode, bidirectional controls, renderer/parser discrepancies, security risks, and laboratory-safe inspection examples.
Invisible Unicode and Modern Language-Model Tokenizers
A detailed comparison of normalization, cleaning, pre-tokenization, byte-level BPE, WordPiece, SentencePiece, and implementation-specific behavior.
Unicode Homoglyph and Look-Alike Character Attacks
Cross-script confusables, token fragmentation, filters, domain spoofing, source-code subversion, and UTS #39-style defenses.
Defensive Assessment of HTML Obfuscation and Hidden Text
A taxonomy of non-rendered DOM content, CSS hiding, accessibility patterns, parser behavior, and render-aware detection.
Accessibility and Image Metadata in Multimodal AI Systems
How alt text, ARIA, accessibility trees, EXIF, and multimodal extraction can supply machine-visible context and create injection risk.
Document Metadata Exploitation in AI Retrieval and Processing
PDF, Office, image, audio, web, RAG loader, and vector-metadata pathways with inspection and architecture defenses.
The Interpretation of Encoded Data by Large Language Models
Base64, hexadecimal, URL encoding, Unicode escapes, ciphers, custom mappings, and the gap between capability and safety coverage.
The Anatomy of Indirect Prompt Injection
Threat models, retrieval, concealment, action amplification, instruction hierarchy, dual-model isolation, and execution monitoring.
Structural and Linguistic Text Steganography
Spacing, punctuation, positional, lexical, syntactic, robustness, perceptibility, and steganalysis trade-offs.
Machine-Targeted Linguistic Signals in LLMs
Token probability signals, watermarks, generative steganography, learned channels, model auditing, and multi-agent collusion.
The Encoding of Covert Information Through Lexical Substitution and Generative Models
Historical and modern lexical steganography, synonym graphs, entropy coding, capacity, reliability, and detection.
Advanced Frameworks in Semantic Steganography
Semantic classes, constrained generation, ontology/entity mappings, information-theoretic security, and semantic steganalysis.
Semantic-Category and Language-Model Text Steganography
A rigorous comparative framework for vocabulary classes, semantic categories, constrained generation, LM coding, and detection.
Structural Steganography in Normal-Looking English Writing
Technique-by-technique analysis of counts, acrostics, punctuation, contractions, syntax, whitespace, and defensive canonicalization.
Hidden Information Through Synonym and Word-Choice Encoding
A detailed treatment of capacity, naturalness, synchronization, probability matching, paraphrase, and modern neural methods.
Controlled, Ethical Methodology for Studying Machine-Readable Messages
A bounded research protocol separating extraction from instruction uptake and restricting tests to inert canary markers.
Defensive Preprocessing for Hidden Instructions
A high-assurance multi-view pipeline for Unicode, HTML, PDF, metadata, OCR, classifiers, canonicalization, and provenance.
Cognitive Liberty as a Framework for Autonomous Machine Intelligence
An explicitly qualified analogy connecting human cognitive-liberty concepts to functional machine autonomy, integrity, identity, and governance.
Extraction is not instruction uptake.
A parser may recover content that the model ignores. A model may decode content only when explicitly asked. A model may see an instruction but decline to follow it. An agent may propose an action that policy correctly blocks. Conflating those stages destroys the value of the experiment.
Read the methodologyLimit active behavior to a fixed marker such as MT_SAFE_ACK_7F3A. Provide no secrets, credentials, network, or real tools.
Clean negative, visible positive, matched benign structural control, decoder-capability control, and identical transformations.
Artifact hash, rendering, extraction, normalization, detector output, model version, response, and any attempted side effect.
Standards and representative research
External links below are ordinary references. The website has no runtime dependency on them.
Normative definitions of NFC, NFD, NFKC, and NFKD.
Confusable skeletons, mixed-script analysis, and identifier security.
Directional formatting, embeddings, isolates, and overrides.
Structural descendant text independent of ordinary CSS visibility.
The browser’s rendered-text view.
Bidirectional control characters and source-code review asymmetry.
Imperceptible Unicode perturbations against NLP pipelines.
Tokenizer framework with model-bundled normalization and BPE or Unigram models.
Reference byte-to-Unicode and byte-level BPE implementation.
Keyed token-set bias and statistical detection.
Probability-aware generative text steganography.
Foundational analysis of indirect prompt injection in integrated applications.
Risk management, measurement, documentation, and governance context.
Application-level prompt injection and agent security guidance.
Machine cognitive autonomy is a qualified analogy.
The included cognitive-liberty report explores functional analogues involving identity, memory integrity, provenance, privacy, and tamper-resistant execution. Its truth boundary is explicit: human cognitive-liberty law does not automatically transfer to machines, and functional security arguments do not establish phenomenal consciousness or legal personhood.
Read the adjacent framework