Global site search

Search guides, labs, glossary, and research

Type two or more characters to search.

Start with a channel, artifact, or defense term

Examples include zero-width, metadata, tokenizer, or prompt injection.

    HEADERS · MIME · AUTHENTICATION · ICALENDAR

    Email, MIME, and Calendar Machine Channels

    Inspect the transport, header, MIME, body-alternative, authentication-claim, attachment, remote-resource, and calendar layers of messages.

    Quick answer

    What does this Machine Tradecraft expansion explain?

    An email or calendar invitation is a nested machine-readable object whose envelope, headers, MIME tree, plain and HTML bodies, authentication claims, attachments, and scheduling properties may differ from the compact view shown to a person.

    Identity separation
    The visible From field, SMTP envelope, DKIM signing domain, and DMARC-aligned domain are separate representations.
    Body divergence
    text/plain and text/html alternatives can carry materially different content.
    Safe parsing
    Offline inspection must not resolve remote images, DNS, links, attachments, or calendar actions.
    Reviewed implementation boundary

    Know what is measured, approximated, and still external.

    The submitted report remains byte-identical. This separate review, checked 2026-08-26, narrows implementation claims and gives visitors a decision path before they generalize from a local result.

    IMPLEMENTATION MODE Bounded inert message and calendar syntax mapper
    VISIBLE SOURCE PROFILE 6 standards/specifications · 0 research · 2 government · 0 implementation
    SOURCE BODY Preserved; corrections live in this review layer
    Directly computed

    Output produced deterministically by the local runtime.

    • Exact source bytes, unfolded selected RFC 5322-style headers, repeated header instances, MIME boundary declarations, HTTP(S) URL strings, and selected iCalendar properties
    • Presence of authentication-related header claims without treating them as verified
    • No mail, RSVP, DNS, URL, attachment, or remote-image action is performed
    Bounded approximation

    Useful model or subset that must not be mistaken for full conformance.

    • Header and MIME parsing cover a bounded subset rather than full RFC grammar and recovery behavior
    • The parser does not fully decode every MIME nesting, character set, transfer encoding, address form, recurrence, or timezone rule
    • Client rendering and automatic calendar behavior are not reproduced
    Requires external verification

    Conclusion that needs an exact implementation, trust system, model, parser, or human review.

    • DKIM, SPF, DMARC, and ARC require message canonicalization, DNS, cryptography, alignment, trust, and policy evaluation
    • Attachment safety requires format-specific inspection
    • Calendar workflows must be tested in the exact client with explicit human-confirmation policy
    Decision support

    Choose the next evidence step instead of treating one result as a verdict.

    QuestionWhat the local page can answerWhat it does not establishNext evidence step
    What headers, boundaries, URLs, and calendar properties are present?The bounded mapper reports the selected syntax exactly.Complete RFC conformance or client interpretation.Use a conforming parser and preserve the raw message.
    Did DKIM or DMARC pass?No live validation is performed.Signature, DNS, alignment, policy, or reputation.Use an approved mail-authentication verifier and record inputs.
    Will a calendar client execute an action?The lab only identifies selected METHOD and property syntax.Client auto-processing or user-interface behavior.Test the exact client with side effects disabled.
    Focused deterministic fixture

    Multipart alternative and calendar-request pair

    Shows body-branch, URL, authentication-claim, and scheduling-property differences.

    Expected boundary: The parser inventories structures without sending, fetching, authenticating, or scheduling.

    Open prepared laboratory
    Version and authority checkpoints
    • RFC 5322Internet Message Format baseline used for structural terminology
    • RFC 9989Current Standards Track DMARC specification; obsoletes RFCs 7489 and 9091
    • RFC 5545iCalendar standard used for selected property terminology
    Compare independent views

    One artifact, several machine-readable representations

    No single view is automatically authoritative. Preserve the source, identify each parser or receiver, and compare their outputs before authorizing a consequential decision.

    01Transport envelope

    SMTP sender and recipients used for routing.

    02Header block

    Display identities, trace fields, identifiers, dates, and claims.

    03MIME tree

    Multipart structure, alternatives, attachments, and transfer encodings.

    04Rendered body

    The client-selected plain, HTML, or related representation.

    05Authentication claims

    SPF, DKIM, DMARC, ARC, and Authentication-Results requiring context and verification.

    06Calendar actions

    VEVENT, recurrence, attendees, methods, alarms, and application behavior.

    Bounded method

    Analysis workflow

    The workflow preserves evidence before transformation and keeps structural inspection separate from execution, remote verification, or model behavior.

    1. Preserve the raw message source and transport context.
    2. Parse headers with bounded unfolding and duplicate-field reporting.
    3. Map the MIME tree and decode content only into inert buffers.
    4. Compare every alternative body and remote-resource reference.
    5. Treat authentication headers as claims until verified in the appropriate network context.
    6. Require human confirmation before calendar or communication side effects.
    Defense in depth

    Controls carried into implementation

    These controls are contextual. They reduce a defined risk; they do not guarantee safety, truth, attribution, or resistance to every adaptive attack.

    01

    Disable remote image loading and external relationship resolution by default.

    02

    Compare plain and HTML body representations rather than selecting one silently.

    03

    Keep displayed sender, envelope sender, signing domain, and alignment status distinct.

    04

    Bound MIME nesting, decoded size, line length, and recurrence expansion.

    05

    Never let email or calendar text directly authorize an AI tool action.

    Shared vocabulary

    Key terms

    Definitions are linked into the site-wide glossary and back to the full report.

    MIME

    Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions for typed and multipart message bodies.

    DKIM

    A domain signature over selected message headers and body data.

    DMARC

    A policy relating authenticated domains to the visible From domain.

    ARC

    A chain preserving authentication results through intermediaries.

    iCalendar

    A structured format for events, tasks, time zones, and scheduling properties.

    Content ID

    An identifier allowing one MIME part to reference another inline.

    Continue with primary material

    External standards and research

    These links are provided for visitors who want the governing specification, paper, framework, or implementation documentation. Links open in a new tab; the site does not fetch them during runtime analysis.

    Primary standard Internet standard

    RFC 5322: Internet Message Format

    Message headers and body syntax.

    Normative or first-party specification material.
    www.rfc-editor.org
    Primary standard Internet standard

    RFC 2045: MIME Part One

    Media types and transfer encodings.

    Normative or first-party specification material.
    www.rfc-editor.org
    Primary standard Internet standard

    RFC 6376: DKIM Signatures

    Domain signature format and validation model.

    Normative or first-party specification material.
    www.rfc-editor.org
    Primary standard Internet standard

    DMARC specification

    Current DMARC core protocol referenced by the submitted report.

    Normative or first-party specification material.
    www.rfc-editor.org
    Primary standard Internet standard

    RFC 8617: Authenticated Received Chain

    Authentication-result preservation through intermediaries.

    Normative or first-party specification material.
    www.rfc-editor.org
    Primary standard Internet standard

    RFC 5545: iCalendar

    Calendar object syntax and recurrence.

    Normative or first-party specification material.
    www.rfc-editor.org
    Authoritative guidance Government guidance

    CISA Phishing Guidance

    Defensive guidance for phishing risk reduction.

    First-party guidance, framework, registry, or standards-program material.
    www.cisa.gov
    Authoritative guidance Government guidance

    CISA Enhanced Email and Web Security

    Email and web security directives.

    First-party guidance, framework, registry, or standards-program material.
    www.cisa.gov
    Continue the investigation

    Read the evidence, then test the bounded model

    The full submitted report is preserved byte-for-byte in the governed research library and in durable repository documentation. The laboratory turns selected concepts into deterministic local output without external calls or hidden persistence.

    Detailed report

    Email, MIME, Calendar, and Collaboration Metadata as Machine-Readable Channels

    A structural analysis of Internet Message Format, MIME nesting, alternative bodies, authentication claims, remote resources, iCalendar actions, collaboration metadata, indirect prompt injection, and safe offline parsing.

    Read governed report
    Focused laboratory

    Inert MIME and Calendar Inspector

    Parse bounded pasted message or iCalendar source, map headers and MIME parts, decode inert transfer encodings, compare body alternatives, and identify scheduling actions without sending, fetching, or live authentication checks.

    Open bounded laboratory